Thursday, September 2, 2010

M. Myers- Recitation Literacy

From reading this blog, I understand that Recitation Literacy was meant to suit the social environment and needs of the time. However, after all that I have experienced at Kent State and from my few experiences in the classroom, I cannot fathom how anyone thought that recitation meant understanding. Experience based learning was second or third in the hierarchy. I can picture this classroom scenario, with students standing and reciting lines or writing lines repeatedly. That would be a horrible way to learn, because memorization means next to nothing.

I can remember going to a bible camp that would give you a candy bar if you could recite every book of the bible. Well, I did it... but I can remember about 1/4 of the books today. I have no idea what these books were about of what the names meant (but at least I got my Hershey bar).

I think that recitation still exists. Diagramming sentences and copying sentences is probably still done. However, I really hope we all know that experience and hands-on-learning is how we can help our students understand and apply meaning. Teachers are no longer authoritative sources of all wisdom, but guides to learning and discovery.

1 comment:

  1. Jordan,
    I agree with you. Recitation does mean next to nothing. I have memorized and recited information for many of my classes, even some as recent as 3 months ago, and I have already forgotten that information. I feel like these students probably learned nothing at all. Whatever they happened to soak in while memorizing and reciting is the knowledge they were left with, at least that is how it seems to me.

    ReplyDelete